Note-Read more about monitoring and evaluating outcomes and impact. These might be more difficult to monitor on a routine basis. Impacts: These are related to longer-term or broader changes. Outcomes: These are related to the changes or difference made as a result of the organization’s outputs. Outputs: These will be specific products or elements of service provided by the organization, such as advice sessions, training days or publications. Inputs: As well as monitoring expenditure, some organisations will monitor other inputs, such as staff and volunteer time. Monitoring should be proportionate to the size of the organisation and level of funding. Funders and commissioners may ask for information that is not felt useful by the organisation, but there may be room for flexibility and negotiation. Strategic aims and objectives and annual operational plans will indicate the broader areas and the more specific areas for monitoring. This simple checking becomes monitoring when information is collected routinely and systematically against a plan. The second stage of the monitoring and evaluation cycle: what and how to monitor.Īll organisations keep records and notes, and discuss what they are doing. Organisations may focus on different questions at different points in time, and they may need different types of information gathering. How well have we met our expected outcomes?.How do we fit within a network of services?.How well are we meeting identified needs?.How appropriate is the management structure?.You will then be able to prioritise the information you need to collect regularly and on an occasional basis by being clear about the key questions, such as: How will monitoring and evaluation evaluation findings be used in short-term planning and decision making, and quality reviews?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |